Oregon Senate passes bill for permanent standard time … or possibly permanent daylight saving time
By Anthony Macuk (KGW)
SALEM, Ore. (KGW) — The Oregon Legislature is once again flirting with the idea of getting rid of the twice-annual switching of the clocks. Senate Bill 1038, which passed the state Senate Tuesday, could set Oregon up to adopt either permanent standard time or permanent daylight saving time, depending on what the federal government, Washington and California do.
Speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, bill sponsor Sen. Kim Thatcher, R-Keizer, explained that her priority is simply to lock the clocks, regardless of which timeframe comes out on top. She said the bill sets Oregon up to take whichever approach happens to work out sooner.
"I can't say which of these would happen, but I do know that this bill gives us the highest percent chance of ditching the switch," she said.
Under current federal law, states can choose to opt out of daylight saving time and remain on standard time year-round, but they aren't allowed to implement permanent daylight saving time. Only Arizona and Hawaii have opted for permanent standard time; all others continue to switch the clocks.
Oregon first pursued a change in 2019 when the legislature passed a bill — also sponsored by Thatcher — to switch to permanent daylight saving time. The bill included two trigger conditions: it will only kick in if Congress changes the federal law and if Washington and California both decide to make the same switch. Washington quickly got on board with a similar bill, but so far, California and the federal government haven't budged.
The idea of moving in the other direction emerged last year when Thatcher introduced Senate Bill 1548, which proposed a switch to year-round standard time, bypassing the need for federal approval. The bill initially didn't include the California-and-Washington trigger either, but Thatcher added it to get the bill through the Senate — though it ultimately died in the House.
SB 1038 essentially combines the two prior bills; if the federal law changes and Washington and California switch to permanent daylight savings time within 10 years, Oregon will follow suit. And if the other two states instead decide to switch to permanent standard time within 10 years, Oregon will do likewise.
Thatcher said she took an all-of-the-above approach for SB 1038 because she heard differing opinions from other lawmakers last year about whether permanent standard time or permanent daylight saving time would be the better strategy, but either way, no one wanted Oregon to be out of sync with Washington or California.
The bill passed 18-11; two senators who spoke in opposition said that they did not want to allow for the possibility of switching to permanent standard time because of negative impacts during the summer.
"A number of the emails that I received from folks shared that they are not comfortable with driving in the dark," said Sen. Wlnsvey Campos. "These are folks that might otherwise be frequenting businesses, and so, this is a loss of revenue to them."
Supporters generally said they had less of an opinion about which way Oregon goes, as long as it stays matched to its neighbors. Sen. Jeff Golden, whose district sits along Oregon's southern border, said he'd heard a large amount of feedback from his constituents that convinced him to back Thatcher's approach.
"There's really a lot of consensus in my district on two points... one, let's stop switching time. We don't want to switch time anymore. It's confusing; it's disrupting; let's go to one or the other," he said. "And two, let's be the same as California."
Like its predecessors, SB 1038 would only apply to the part of the state that operates on Pacific Time. The majority of Malheur County at the eastern edge of Oregon operates on Mountain Time and would continue to do so even if the legislation takes effect.
