Opinion: Jill Biden’s prophecy
(CNN) — Trying to achieve moral virtue is not easy, the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle taught. If you have to pick between two extremes, choose “the lesser of two evils,” because that’s likelier to bring you to the desired middle way.
That’s the approach President Joe Biden implies when he often quotes his father: “Don’t compare me to the Almighty. Compare me to the alternative.”
Yet, when first lady Jill Biden appeared on “The View” Wednesday, the choice was painted in much starker terms: “I believe Americans are going to choose good over evil.”
She predicted that the polls showing her husband trailing former President Donald Trump “are going to turn … as time goes on as, as people start to focus a little bit more about what’s at stake and start to become educated on the issues and the differences between them…”
A day later, Jill and Joe Biden got the biggest piece of evidence they can cite in hopes of moving the polls in his favor: A Manhattan jury returned a swift verdict of guilty against Trump on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
Yet the former president didn’t miss a beat in his relentless effort to brand the trial and his conviction as “rigged,” falsely arguing that the outcome was orchestrated by the Biden campaign and using it to ramp up his fundraising.
And Republicans, particularly those seeking to become Trump’s vice president pick, flocked to condemn the verdict. “Republicans have been lining up more quickly than kids at an ice cream truck to discredit the judicial process and declare their support for Trump,” Julian Zelizer noted.
Trump’s trial is over but America’s is still in its early stages. The voters are being tested by the politics of bitter division and will be asked to choose sides this fall between two deeply unpopular major party candidates.
“We’ve never had a trial of a president before,” observed legal analyst Norm Eisen, who penned a daily diary from the courtroom for CNN Opinion. “And yet, the trial was about one of the oldest American ideals: that no one is above the law. We overthrew a British king and put a constitution in his place. And with all of our ups and down as a nation, we have ever kept that idea alive. Having a president subject to the same laws, rules and procedures as any other American is a powerful reaffirmation of that idea.”
As president, Trump was acquitted in two impeachment trials in the US Senate, and he has so far fended off trials in three other criminal cases. But in New York Thursday, “the enormity of Trump being finally held accountable by a jury of his peers after so many allegations resonates across the nation and around the world,” Eisen observed.
“The ranks of the anti-Trump #Resistance haven’t celebrated this hard since November 7, 2020,” Patrick T. Brown pointed out. “Whatever the polls have said up until Thursday about the odds this November, progressives might tell themselves, being found guilty of all 34 charges of falsifying business records could be the silver bullet that prevents a second Trump term.”
“But let’s think about that logic: Trump’s personal eccentricities and baggage have been well-known for years. The act for which hush money was proffered — allegedly cheating on his postpartum wife with an adult film actress — has been known since 2018. Are there really that many voters whose view of Trump as a man, or politician, could be altered by bookkeeping irregularities? How many would-be Trump voters will be swayed against him because of miscategorized business expenses?”
And SE Cupp wrote, “Will his voters care now that they’re about to elect a convicted felon? Probably not. But how this will impact swing and undecided voters is the looming question — they might not be so forgiving.”
As legal analyst Joey Jackson noted, the Trump defense trained its fire on star prosecution witness Michael Cohen, an admitted liar and convict. “Team Trump called Cohen the ‘Greatest Liar of All Time’ (the ‘GLOAT’ for short) in addition to being a biased witness that hated Trump and had a huge axe to grind. The defense lambasted him, asserting that the jury could not convict based upon his word.”
Political strategist Paul Begala wrote that Biden’s team should resist the temptation to center their election pitch around Trump’s felony conviction.
“Democrats should focus on voters’ lives, not Trump’s criminality. Democrats should put Trump ‘on trial’ for suggesting he was open to cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; for wanting to kick millions of Americans off Obamacare; for promising to roll back environmental rules and policies if oil executives raised $1 billion to return him to the White House; for stacking the Supreme Court with right-wing partisans who overturned Roe v. Wade and might come after gay marriage and contraception next. They should hammer Trump for tanking the strongest border security bill in decades; for kowtowing to the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, and for wanting to cut taxes for his fellow billionaires,” Begala advised.
De Niro’s moment
Biden’s campaign had been content to let Trump stew in his role as criminal defendant without getting involved. That changed Tuesday when the president’s team trotted out actor Robert De Niro and two police officers injured at the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot to face the press outside the criminal courthouse where Trump was on trial.
“The stated goal was to highlight Trump’s trespasses on democracy and general unfitness for office,” wrote David Axelrod, “but the scene quickly devolved into a shouting match between De Niro and a small crowd of hecklers who roasted him as he roasted Trump. Great fodder for ‘Saturday Night Live,’ but not necessarily the campaign.”
“Fingers were pointed between De Niro and the Trump-loving hecklers. F-bombs flew. And those images and De Niro’s impulse to plunge into the legal fray hours before the case would go to the jury became the story.”
Axelrod added, “It’s also a little bewildering why Team Biden, struggling with younger voters, cast De Niro as its point man here. After all, nothing speaks to Gen Z more than yet another octogenarian.”
“Who thought this was a good idea?”
In the Wall Street Journal, Karl Rove also questioned the strategy of enlisting De Niro, who said Trump “wants to destroy not only the city but the country, and eventually he can destroy the world.”
“It might’ve been convincing if Mr. De Niro argued that Mr. Trump’s policies would hurt the city, the country or even the planet. But what voter not already in the Biden camp would believe that Mr. Trump is a cartoonish supervillain bent on obliterating the globe?” Republicans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene are offering equally unhinged statements, Rove argued.
For more:
Arick Wierson: Dear American voter, you should care what the rest of the world thinks
Dean Obeidallah: What the Libertarians are warning us all about Trump
Mark Mellman: Would a conviction hurt Trump on Election Day?
Women in the lead
The frontrunners in Mexico’s election Sunday are both women, as Alice Driver wrote. It’s “a stark contrast to the United States, which has never elected a woman to the highest office and has seen its Supreme Court overturn a ruling that established a national right for women to choose abortion.”
“This is not to say that Mexico’s candidates are perfect because women are as complex and fallible as anyone else. For example, (Claudia) Sheinbaum is a staunch supporter of current Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who has called women’s rights activists ‘pseudo-feminists.’ … in Mexico, many debate whether Sheinbaum, who leads the race, will be a feminist leader or even a great president.”
Still, Driver observed that in Mexico, “where at least 10 women and girls are murdered per day, electing a woman to lead the country is beyond symbolic. Whether Sheinbaum or (Xóchitl) Gálvez wins, Mexican citizens will spend the next six years watching a woman lead the country.” Driver added that Susan Segal, CEO of the Americas Society, cited studies showing that “women are more likely to build consensus and advocate for a socially inclusive agenda.”
Netanyahu’s hold on power
Frida Ghitis posed a question that many have asked since “Hamas breached Israel’s border with Gaza on October 7, brutally massacring more than 1,000 people, kidnapping hundreds, sexually assaulting countless women, and triggering a horrific war in Gaza.” Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “was in charge on the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust. And he is now the prime minister on whose watch Israel is enduring a massive international backlash over its campaign to uproot Hamas that has resulted in unimaginable suffering in Gaza, a wave of global isolation, slanderous accusations against Israel in international courts and a dangerous split in support in the United States.”
On Friday, Biden announced the terms of an Israeli peace proposal. Peter Bergen argued that Hamas and Israel should seize the opportunity to stop the war. “While there are clearly many ‘what ifs’ in this plan, and it may not satisfy spoilers like the right-wingers in Netanyahu’s government or some of the hard core of Hamas, the enemy of the perfect deal is not the reasonably OK deal. And this is a sufficiently OK deal for both sides. Otherwise, the war will rage on without end with all that implies for the people of Gaza and, ultimately, for the state of Israel.”
Melinda French Gates
Jill Filipovic wrote that “there is something irrefutably broken about a global system in which a small number of people are able to amass staggering amounts of wealth, a huge number struggle to simply survive (and many don’t) and then we applaud those among the uber-wealthy who bestow some of their largess on the suffering masses.” But “some billionaires are behaving much more generously and ethically than others. And their work should stand in contrast to those who simply accrue more toys or watch their net worth go infinitely up.”
She called out Melinda French Gates for committing $1 billion over the next two years to fund efforts to protect women’s and girls’ rights, and said MacKenzie Scott has helped forge a path for women billionaires to set a powerful example on the importance of philanthropy.
Bennifer II
After an unhappy first marriage, a second one is the “triumph of hope over experience,” the English writer Samuel Johnson famously said. That goes doubly for a second relationship between two people.
Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez’s “first romance collapsed in 2003 under the weight of media attention, just days before their wedding,” Holly Thomas wrote. “Now, with an album, film and documentary themed around their second act, Lopez has invited that scrutiny back again, despite her beloved’s obvious reluctance. In the context of the last few weeks of breakup rumors, it looks like a catastrophic misjudgment.”
“It’s little wonder so many of us are invested in Bennifer… The first time they got together, they represented the epitome of early 2000s glamor. Every public sighting channeled ostentatious devotion, from Affleck’s appearance in Lopez’s 2002 “Jenny From The Block” music video to the $2.5 million dollar pink diamond in her engagement ring. They even pioneered the cloying portmanteau nickname.”
Don’t miss
Adam Kinzinger and Ben Hodges: Time to call Putin’s bluff
Patricia Grisafi: The uproar over Emma Corrin’s armpits is about more than just a little hair
Kara Alaimo: This trending game is a tragedy waiting to happen
Bishop Robert Barron: I’m a Catholic bishop who has found an ally in Bill Maher
Regina Kim: May is the month when we honor Asian Americans. Here’s what a lot of people get wrong
WNBA’s Layshia Clarendon and Brianna Turner: Let trans NCAA athletes play
AND…
Josh Gibson
At least since 1947, when Jackie Robinson became the first Black player in Major League Baseball, fans have wondered “whether it was just or even accurate to say that White baseball greats of the early 20th century — from Walter Johnson to Babe Ruth to Lou Gehrig to Joe DiMaggio — were greater players than (Josh) Gibson, Satchel Paige, Cool Papa Bell, Buck Leonard and other Negro Legends whose gifts have received greater acknowledgment since integration took effect,” wrote Gene Seymour.
Now the debate can take place on a more level playing field: MLB announced Tuesday that player stats from the Negro Leagues are being incorporated into baseball’s record books.
To take one standout example: Josh Gibson, a catcher, now owns the baseball record for best single season batting average (.466) and career slugging percentage (.718), Seymour noted.
“For generations of baseball aficionados, especially African Americans, it’s somewhat breathtaking to wake up in a world where Gibson, whose untimely death at 35 from a stroke was also attributed by friends and colleagues to a heart broken from being prohibited by racism from showing what he could do in the big leagues, could now be officially considered the Best Ever To Play The Game.”
The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
