After Trump’s guilty verdict, threats and attempts to dox Trump jurors proliferate online
Here is a sketch of Donald Trump during his conviction on May 30.
New York (CNN) — On online forums that have previously been linked to mass shootings, people are threatening violence and attempting to publicly identify the 12 New York jurors who on Thursday decided to convict former President Donald Trump.
The calls for retribution began immediately after the verdict was announced. Experts who track online extremism told CNN the volume of violent rhetoric in the last 24 hours is as high as it was after the FBI’s search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property in August 2022.
“Hope these jurors face some street justice,” one anonymous user on a pro-Trump forum wrote. Another suggestively asked, “Wouldn’t [it] be interesting if just one person from Trump’s legal team anonymously leaked the names of the jurors?”
Anonymity is supposed to add a layer of protection for jurors doing their civic duty. Once reserved only for cases involving violent criminal enterprises, the practice is becoming more common. The judge in the Trump New York trial issued an order in March agreeing with prosecutors that most information about the jurors would be sealed. Trump’s lawyers did not disagree, according to the order.
Overnight, however, anonymous internet users on sites that are known havens of hate and harassment began sharing names, home addresses and other personal information belonging to people they say might have been members of the jury, a practice known as doxxing.
This form of amateur online sleuthing can lead to real-life security issues. For example, a commonly used tactic called “swatting” involves a caller making a bogus crime report intended to trigger a massive law enforcement response to a target’s residence.
In the past, people whose personal information have been shared online in this way have been misidentified and sometimes have nothing at all to do with the issue at hand.
“Unfortunately, social media has given rise to a whole generation of amateur sleuthing that lacks journalism standards and ethics, leading to countless examples of mistaken identities and wrongful accusations,” Ben Decker, the CEO of Memetica, a threat analysis company, told CNN Friday. “While the sleuthers themselves face few, if any, consequences, the victims of these accusations become the targets of violent threats both on and offline,” he added.
Violent rhetoric targeting other people involved in the case, including the presiding judge, the district attorney and journalists who reported on the case, was identified by researchers at Advance Democracy, a nonprofit organization that conducts public-interest research, the group’s president, Daniel Jones, told CNN Friday.
Last summer, purported names, photographs and home addresses of grand jurors in Fulton County, Georgia, circulated on the far-right internet after the grand jury voted to indict Trump.
Similarly, after the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago in 2022, a Florida court removed information, including the office address, of a federal magistrate judge from its website, after internet users began targeting the judge, claiming the judge had signed off on the search warrant.
The volume of violent online rhetoric seen on anti-government and extremists forums in the 24 hours since Trump’s conviction is as high as it was in the wake of the FBI’s search of Mar-a-Lago property in August 2022, according to John Cohen, former acting undersecretary for intelligence and analysis at the Department of Homeland Security.
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a nonprofit that tracks extremism, released data Friday showing that about 9,300 online postings mentioned civil unrest within a day of the Trump conviction, compared to 9,900 unrest-related posts after the Mar-a-Lago search.
In September 2019, after House Democrats announced Trump’s first impeachment inquiry and Trump quoted a pastor on Twitter warning of a “Civil War-like fracture” in the country if Trump was removed from office, unrest-related online posts numbered nearly 20,000, according to ISD.
“[F]alse and misleading narratives surrounding the verdict [have] the potential to serve as a catalyst for individual acts of violence and other illegal activity, while also continuing to increase distrust in our democratic institutions,” ISD analysts wrote.
Days after the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, an armed man who had directed increasingly violent online rhetoric at the FBI tried to breach the bureau’s Cincinnati office and was killed in an armed standoff with FBI agents.
Some of the violent language in the last 24 hours is “a direct illustration of what concerns law enforcement as we get closer and closer to the election,” Cohen said, calling it “a harbinger of what’s to come.”
Foreign intelligence services and terrorist groups will likely try to amplify the online vitriol in the coming days and weeks, he added.
The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
CNN’s Zachary B. Wolf contributed to this report.
