Measure 87 serves a role, but packs little punch

Is it a measure that’s going to change the way you live? Probably not, unless you’re a state judge. And according to experts, probably not even if you ARE a state judge. But Measure 87 is still necessary bureaucratic work that could use your vote.

The measure was passed unanimously by the state Senate, and had a 60-40 approval vote in the House. It was officially brought to the table by the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party opted not to take a position.

“Is it a sexy topic that’s going to generate a lot of media coverage? Well, no, probably not,” laughed local lawyer, former Bend mayor and political analyst Jeff Eager.

Measure 87 further establishes the ability of state judges to stand in the front of the classroom, or serve on the front lines with the National Guard. But according to Oregon National Guard Public Affairs Director Major Stephen Bomar, it’s something many state judges already do.

“We already do have lawyers, district attorneys, and judges that already serve in the National Guard as well as many other fields,” says Bomar.

So it’s less of a landmark, and more of a remarking of constitution verbiage. The measure adds an additional two paragraphs to Section 8 Article 15 of the Oregon Constitution. In essence, they’ll establish that their role of a judge doesn’t impede their ability to lead a classroom or serve in the National Guard.

“Just because you’re a judge on your weekdays, doesn’t mean you can’t drive a tank on the weekends as well,” says Bomar.

It’s lacking the punch that some of the other measures on the table this November, but like those other measures; it needs your vote to move forward.

“the Legislature cannot amend the Constitution on its own,” said Eager. “That’s why we’re all voting on what seems to be kind of a common-sense type of change to the law.”