Skip to Content
Central Oregon

Planning board moves Bend Parkway draft plan forward for final review

(Update: Adding video, comments from engineer)

BEND, Ore. (KTVZ) – In the next 20 years, Bend is expected to grow by about 28,000 households and more than 27,000 jobs.

John Bosket, an engineer with DKS Associates, said Thursday that on an average day, there are between 20,000 and 50,000 vehicles using the parkway.

“You can see volumes in the mid to high 60,000(s) during your busier months of the year, and most of those trips -- about 90% -- are beginning or ending their trip somewhere in Bend,” he said.

The Bend Metropolitan Planning Organization met Thursday to review investment strategies and progress on the U.S. 97 Bend Parkway Plan.

The plan is aimed at making commuting through Bend quicker and safer.

“When you have poor travel time reliability, it means it may be very hard to really know how long a trip is going to take,” Bosket said. “One day, it may be 20 minutes, the next day it may be 30. You never really know what you're in for.”

The draft plan will now go to state and local agencies, including the city of Bend, Deschutes County and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, for a 30-day review and comment period.

A study of the area showed there were frequent crashes at the intersections of Cooley Road, Powers Road and Pinebrook Boulevard.

Studies also showed shorter gaps, a lack of acceleration lanes and not enough merging distance led to unsafe driving maneuvers, which is why road officials are considering removing access to the parkway from Hawthorne and Lafayette avenues.

The MPO also reviewed alternative mobility targets, which are aimed at helping reduce the need for state and local investments while still allowing local development plans.

The goal of the alternative mobility targets is to reflect more realistic financial requirements.

ODOT planners collected responses in 2018 from 1,799 citizens who brought up many of the problems identified in the parkway study, including:

  • Frequent congestion and delays throughout the parkway.
  • Problems with traffic signals, intersections, and parkway access.
  • Safety concerns for people who walk and bicycles along or across the parkway.

There are 29 projects included in tier one, which is the short-term tier expected to take 10 years.

The first 10 years would include improvements to the south end at Murphy and Powers roads, as well as better off-ramps at Reed Market Road and Hawthorne Avenue (where a short "right-out" onto the parkway would be eliminated).

There are 21 projects in the medium-term tier two and one project -- an active transportation crossing at Wilson Avenue -- in tier three, which is expected to take place in years 16 through 20 of the parkway plan. 

The second phase would add ramp meters, an overpass at China Hat Road and new technology alerting drivers to weather warnings and speed limit changes.

The third phase would add a pedestrian and bike crossing at Wilson Avenue.

Road officials said between now and likely December, they will be sending plans out for formal review and comment.

They also gave the policy board and its technical advisory committee about a week to receive final comments before they start formal revisions.

Bend / Government-politics / News / Top Stories
Author Profile Photo

Rhea Panela

Rhea Panela is a multimedia journalist for NewsChannel 21. Learn more about Rhea here.



      1. Why did you cringe? Should you maybe surrender your license? Do you feel like you are endangering people while driving fast through populated areas in a well sound proofed box that obscures much of your vision and senses of your surroundings?

    1. That’s why I voted to stop the project back in the early nineties. The vote that I cast was to require it to qualify for federal funding which it didn’t because the feds also observed the incompetence. The feds generally refused to fund things that only benefited a few west side developers. Those were the days when the feds weren’t part of the Trump organization.

  1. Redmond and ODOT need to seriously consider relocating HWY 97 East starting at the north side of Cinder Butte, out to the East of town, around the airport and tie back in south of Redmond. The current one in Redmond can become a business route. This could have been aligned closer and easier 10-20 years ago, but the city has been allowed to be built out without thinking about this obvious problem until it was too late.

  2. Has the appropriate Parties in the Bend City Government and associated agencies received permission from Luke Richter / “PeaceKeeper” to go through with this?

    After all, the parkway does provide ICE and its “storm troopers” with high speed access and egress throughout Bend, Central Oregon, and all points North and South.

    Just ask’in.

Leave a Reply

Skip to content