Skip to Content
News
Remaining Ad Time Ad - 00:00

Oregon timber companies, environmentalists sign ‘historic’ pact

Gov. Brown hails pact, which heads off lawsuit, Nov. ballot measure fights

SALEM, Ore. (AP) — Environmental groups and timber companies in Oregon, which have clashed for decades, on Monday unveiled a road map for overhauling forest practice regulations, a step which Gov. Kate Brown called “historic.”

"This agreement proves that we can build a better future for Oregonians if we work together with a willingness to compromise. Healthy forests and a vibrant forestry industry are not mutually exclusive,” Brown told a news conference with representatives

Leaders of around a dozen environmental groups, including Oregon Wild, the Audubon Society of Portland and Cascadia Wildlands, and a dozen timber companies, including Weyerhaeuser, one of the largest forest products companies in the world, and Lone Rock of Roseburg, signed the memorandum of understanding after quietly holding meetings in Salem and Portland.

They agreed to a process that will drive changes to Oregon forest practice regulations, including seeking a statewide habitat conservation plan to guarantee that critical habitat for endangered and threatened species is protected.

Another goal is to create business certainty for Oregon's timber-products industry. Oregon leads the nation in wood-products manufacturing, but environmental groups and the timber industry have been backing rival initiative petitions which seem to put measures on the ballot, and have filed lawsuits.

Under the new agreement, both sides would “complete a stand-down from pursuing changes through the initiative process, related legal actions, and certain other relevant legislative and regulatory proceedings while the facilitated process is working.”


News release from Gov. Kate Brown's office:

Governor Kate Brown Brokers Unprecedented Agreement Between Timber and Environmental Groups

The memorandum of understanding will chart a new path for science-based forest management in Oregon

SALEM, Ore. -- Gov. Kate Brown announced Monday a historic agreement between representatives from the state's forest industry and major environmental groups to chart a collaborative course toward meaningful, science-based forest management in Oregon.

The agreement takes a significant step toward a new era of cooperation, leaving behind the conflicts of the past.

"This pact proves that when we work together with a willingness to compromise, we can create a better future in Oregon," Brown said. "Oregonians want healthy forests and fish, a vibrant forest sector, and prosperous rural communities. These are not mutually exclusive goals. The conversations that brought forth this agreement, coupled with sound science, will bring certainty for everyone involved while protecting Oregon's environment and endangered species."

The signed memorandum of understanding (MOU), with 2-dozen signatories, addresses three key issues. It will:

  • Drive a process for Oregon to update its timber practices: For the first time, Oregon will strive for the endorsement of federal wildlife agencies, signifying that the state's forest practices are protective of threatened and endangered species, including Oregon's iconic salmon. Through this process, the state will seek a Habitat Conservation Plan, allowing Oregonians to continue their long tradition of working in the woods while honoring natural habitats.
  • Support passage of new legislation for the 2020 session on aerial spraying of pesticides: A state-of-the-art system will build confidence with forest neighbors, who will be eligible to receive real-time notification that aerial spraying will occur. This first of its kind system will expand protected spray buffers around drinking water, homes, and schools.
  • Expand forest stream buffers in the Rogue-Siskiyou region: New legislation will also expand forest stream buffers along salmon, steelhead, and bull trout streams, aligning forest practices in the area with those of the rest of western Oregon.

"With this MOU, both sides have agreed that all forestry-related initiative petitions and related litigation will be dropped after the passage of the legislation this session, the announcement said.

"This MOU is shared recognition of the diverse benefits Oregon's forests provide, and the need for more meaningful dialogue around forest issues across the state," said Greg Miller, long-time timber industry executive and representative of the coalition of forest companies. "Oregon is one of the best places in the world to grow and harvest trees sustainably; we lead the nation in wood products manufacturing, and we are proud of our record of environmental stewardship.

"Now as we move forward into a new era of cooperation and transparency, forest policy should continue to rely on the best available science," said Miller. "The 60,000 Oregon families who work in the forest sector — indeed all Oregonians — expect that level of rigor and thoughtfulness when it comes to forest management. With this MOU, we are hopeful that we have found a pathway forward that meets those expectations and sets Oregon up for the most comprehensive, forward-thinking forest policy in the nation."

"Today's agreement is a critical step toward modernizing Oregon's forest rules," said Bob Van Dyk, Oregon policy director at the Wild Salmon Center. "Oregonians are rightfully proud of our forests and what they provide, including some of the best salmon runs in the Lower 48 and drinking water for most of the state. It's our collective duty to make sure that a healthy timber industry doesn't come at the expense of fish, wildlife, and public health."

"This agreement is a genuine show of good faith from both sides," said Van Dyk. "There's still much work to be done for our communities and the healthy environment on which we all depend. There is a long road ahead, but this agreement is a big first step in the right direction."

The complete MOU can be viewed here.


News release from Oregon Wild:

Oregon to Move Forward with Agreement to Protect Forest Waters, Modernize Logging Rules

Compromise between conservation groups and logging industry includes protections for drinking water and salmon, spray notification for forest communities, framework for greater conservation gains

Today, Governor Kate Brown announced a historic agreement between conservation groups and timber companies that is the first step in a process that will see the most significant update of Oregon’s Forest Practices Act in decades. 

The agreement includes 

  • Legislation during the short session to comprehensively reform aerial pesticide spraying practices by the logging industry, including a modern notification system for forest communities, no-spray zones around homes and schools, and buffers along streams and drinking water sources
  • After the passage of spray reform, both the logging industry and conservation groups will stand down on ballot measures for the 2020 election
  • both parties, together with the State of Oregon, agree to pursue a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) from the US Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries for threatened and endangered species that will result in modernization and strengthening of the Oregon Forest Practices Act

Sean Stevens, Executive Director of Oregon Wild and one of the principal negotiators of this agreement, released the following statement:

Today’s announcement has been decades in the making.  It is a direct result of the thousands and thousands of Oregonians all across our state who have written letters, made phone calls, attended hearings, and gathered signatures to demand action to modernize our antiquated logging rules.

When our state first passed the Oregon Forest Practices Act (OFPA) in 1972, it was considered a groundbreaking conservation measure. Sadly, while our scientific understanding of forests, salmon, and wildlife have evolved greatly over the last half-century, the OFPA has not.  As states like Washington and California have moved forward with logging rules that better protect clean drinking water, wildlife habitat, and public health and safety, Oregon has fallen further and further behind.

As a result of this inaction, Oregonians and the environment we hold dear have been left with struggling salmon species, bitter conflicts over chemical spraying and logging practices, and growing alarm from rural Oregon communities about the management of their drinking watersheds. 

The agreement outlined today marks a departure from what has been acknowledged by both conservation organizations and the timber industry as an unacceptable status quo. Reaching this point has been difficult, and required long hours of negotiation, compromise, and working together in good faith. As a result, the agreement envisions significant gains for clean water, healthy forests, and community transparency around logging practices.

However, this agreement is only the first step in a longer journey. Conservation of Oregon’s forests, and communities that live around them and rely upon them, is not guaranteed at the end of this process. It will require significant work over the next two years to modernize forest rules and secure a lasting legacy that benefits all Oregonians.

It is also important to acknowledge the hard work of the citizen activists, organizers, and scientists who have been calling out for change for decades. Without those voices, reaching this point would not have been possible. Their efforts have been an inspiration to Oregon Wild and the larger conservation community, and their continued activism and involvement will drive the conversation and work around the conservation of Oregon’s forests and waters over the next two years of this process and far beyond.

Environment / Money / Oregon-Northwest / Top Stories

The Associated Press

KTVZ news sources

Comments

13 Comments

  1. What am I missing? An admittedly quick glance at this “historic pact” shows more timber management restrictions, and no increase in timber harvest. Something sounds fishy.

        1. “We”? I’m sure Randy Herbert at Starker and his fellow CEO’s would have found your nonsensical complaining SO helpful. What could you have possibly contributed in that forum? You offer nothing but negativity here.

  2. A great step in moving toward a sustainable natural resource environment. It shows what can happen when both sides are willing to understand each others’ goals and forge compromise that addresses both. The “proof is in the pudding” so to speak, but there’s promise here.

      1. You notice I used the word “sustainable.” We’ll never have the mills or the timber harvest that we once had simply because there are fewer timberlands on which to harvest, among other reasons. Historic timberlands in private ownership have largely been sold and subdivided for rural residential development. The present population has also discovered outdoor recreation in ways that were not available (ATVs, etc.) and as a result demanded more land for those activities. And finally, with global warming, the world with its ever increasing population is looking at forests and other natural areas to help mitigate for impacts. Every industry has to adapt to the times or perish, and the wood products industry is no exception.

        1. Timber is very sustainable, just a political hot button for tree huggers, owl petters and indoctrinated grade schoolers.
          Private lands have been sold, yes. How much due to over regulation and be lawsuits? Hmmm.
          Meanwhile our forests burn while the
          “green crowd” rejoice at the lack of roads into our wilderness areas.

  3. Sounds like the “Big guys” are going to do in the small landowners again. Kinda like when the big timber companies used the spotted owl to get rid of a lot of “mom and pop” mills and a lot of gypo logging companies. Install rules and regulations that the small landowners can not meet when wanting to log so the timberlands will get sold to the big guys – at a steep discount – or broken up into subdivision style housing tracts.

  4. Reality, (and environmentalism), always has a liberal bias. Eventually industry, through innovation, comes up with a solution to accept the reality. The world is actually getting better because of this. I see it in the building industry every day. Tougher regulation ultimately ends up with better products costing less money while creating higher paying jobs. It’s called civilization. Hopefully one day Cult45 and the luddites will understand this.

Leave a Reply