Skip to Content
News

C. Oregon Irrigation District breaks ground on area’s latest canal piping project

TERREBONNE, Ore (KTVZ) -- There are still many irrigation canals running through Central Oregon, but many are being replaced by pipes -- for the best of reasons, supporters say.

Many miles have been piped over the past several years, to make more efficient use of water. And more such projects are on the way. A big one had a formal groundbreaking Tuesday.

You may remember last month, when the Deschutes River turned a murky green color.

It was due largely to extremely low water levels in Wickiup Reservoir.

"What we saw had never happened before, with Wickiup being drained." Craig Horrell, manager of the Central Oregon Irrigation District, said Tuesday:

That was in part due to this summer's drought and recent environmental regulations for water usage and to protect wildlife habitat, such as the spotted frog.

But agriculture's demand for water in the canals for irrigation remains, which is why irrigation districts said moving it as efficiently as possible is important.

"We lose about 40 to 50 percent in this canal through evaporation and seepage,” Horrell said.

The Central Oregon Irrigation District broke ground on a project to pipe the Pilot Butte Canal near Terrebonne.

For more than 100 years, the Pilot Butte Canal has remained nearly untouched, but Tuesday’s ground breaking was the first step to completely piping it.

Over the next 30 years, the canal will be completely piped, but the first phase of the project will pipe 7.9 miles of the canal near Smith Rock.

The $2 million Pilot Butte Canal piping project is funded through the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Program and Oregon Lottery funds.

It's actually one of more than 20 Oregon irrigation districts working on similar modernization efforts as part of a program created by the Farmers Conservation Alliance in partnership with Energy Trust of Oregon.

Horrell said it will immediately save 158 cubic feet per second of water when completed.

While canal operators say piping them seem logical, there are environmental concerns.

Opponents say wildlife uses the decades-old water source, as do area trees.

A similar piping project in the Tumalo Irrigation District faces a request for a preliminary injunction to block it by opponents claiming it violates the Environmental Protection Act.

People with homes along the canal also can oppose the efforts, as the High Desert has seen with past piping projects.

"Change is hard, when you're used to having a canal on your property or run through your property, but we will work with those residents as best we can,” Horrell said. “The opportunity is far greater for the Deschutes River."

Horrell said attempts have been made over the years to pipe the canals, but current demand finally forced their hand.

More information: https://www.coid.org/piping/ and http://coidpiping.com/

Central Oregon / Deschutes County / Environment / Government-politics / Top Stories / Wildlife
Author Profile Photo

Jack Hirsh

Jack Hirsh is a multimedia journalist for NewsChannel 21. Learn more about Jack here.

Comments

12 Comments

    1. The canals were man made, so any well that supposedly fed off the canals was probably not very potable water to begin with, would you drink the water coming out of Wickiup??
      Lots of wells dry up due to the water use of golf courses also…

    2. The only wells that will dry up will be the ones that currently dry up every winter when they dry the canals up and the water doesn’t flow. And the only wells effected would be very shallow wells that would not be allowed if drilled as a new potable well.

  1. I really feel for people who bought property because of the calming effect of having a river run through their property. Now their property is reduced in value. It is not worth as much due to this and they lose their enjoyment. Kind of sucks for them. Probably alot of people actually. That is probably why they bought their property in the first place. It is not fair. They should have the right to decline on their property line. Just put the pipeline on properties that agree with it. Is this a problem? It is just not fair to these people. Canal front property people’s lives matter!!!

    1. You do to a certain extent, depending on: (1) governmental regulations on land use, health, and safety; and (2) rights that were given up from past owners of the property. The canal easement is an example of the latter. A title search, which you may have had upon purchasing the land, is the primary mechanism for knowing what rights and restrictions are on the land. It may be of benefit to consult a good land use attorney to explain these things to you if you’re confused.

      1. And they should have learned all that you are saying when they purchased their property – it was presented to them by the title company and should have been by their realitor – if they had read it.

  2. “We lose about 40 to 50 percent in this canal through evaporation and seepage,” – I wonder which of these categories covers the folks who have been and are watering their lawn out of the canals for free?

Leave a Reply

Skip to content